Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher. He is a central figure of modern philosophy, and set the terms by which all subsequent thinkers have had to grapple. He argued that human perception structures natural laws, and that reason is the source of morality. His thought continues to hold a major influence in contemporary thought, especially in fields such as metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics.

This chapter contains sections titled: The Aesthetic Appreciating Nature Skepticism Regarding Aesthetic Nature Aesthetics and the Concept of Nature.

The trenchant scholarship evident in Fried's earlier essays on Couture, Manet and Courbet is equally manifest in this challenging study of the development of French painting in the period 1750-1770. Fried's major thesis is that the central and guiding concern of artists from Chardin to David was the relationship between the viewer of the painting and what is represented in the painting. Those who now concentrate on social and economic determinants of artistic enterprises will be disappointed by Fried's blatantly aesthetic (...) hypothesis that the narrower concerns of the art of painting itself were primary in the mainstream of French painting of this period. But they will be hardpressed to counter the solid evidence that Fried musters in support of his position. (shrink)

This is the third of a series of books by Aschenbrenner dealing with the nature of appraisive concepts, following The Concept of Value and The Concepts of Criticism. In the previous works he attempted to identify, classify and provide a general theoretical framework for all appraisive or value concepts. The first part of the present book expands that analysis by investigating the emergence of appraisive concepts and exploring in depth the nature of the classifications made in the previous books. Aschenbrenner (...) begins with elemental sense experience and works his way to complex human interactions, where he finds that expectations of others lead to demands, and that their fulfillment or nonfulfillment leads to the use of appraisive characterization, ranging from the expression of emotions to the articulation of rights and duties. He provides details of the verbal and conceptual means by which credit and discredit are expressed, modes of opposition between concepts, and various dimensions of meaning. On a more general level, his view is that assertions using appraisive terms are not true or false, nor in need of verification; rather they are evaluated as apt or unapt and as fair or unfair, just or unjust. But these evaluations are themselves appraisive discourse, only at another level. (shrink)